DISSERTAÇÃO DE MESTRADO - PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO E INSTITUIÇÕES DO SISTEMA DE JUSTIÇA - PPGDIR

URI Permanente para esta coleçãohttps://tedebc-teste.ufma.br/handle/tede/637

Navegar

Navegando DISSERTAÇÃO DE MESTRADO - PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO E INSTITUIÇÕES DO SISTEMA DE JUSTIÇA - PPGDIR por Autor "BONATO, Giovanni"

Filtrar resultados informando as primeiras letras
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Administração pública e a arbitragem. Apreciação acerca da efetividade da referida técnica: estudo comparado entre o Estado do Maranhão e os Estados de São Paulo e Minas Gerais.
    (Universidade Federal do Maranhão, 2019-07-05) FALCÃO, Aileen Raphysa Sauaia; BONATO, Giovanni; 017863683-58; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7335452618377036; BONATO, Giovanni; 017863683-58; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7335452618377036; ZUFELATO, Camilo; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7335452618377036; RAMOS NETO, Newton Pereira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2399244462327090
    The present dissertation proposes to draw a comparative study on Arbitration, an appropriate means of dispute resolution, in the cases involving Public Administration in the States of Minas Gerais, São Paulo and Maranhão. Arbitration is nowadays a technique with great visibility in the Brazilian scenario, due to its regulation by Law 9.307 / 96 and subsequent modifications, among which, expressly allows the Public Administration to resolve the conflicts, in the which they appear as part, through arbitration. The perspective faced goes through the conception of effectiveness, in order to verify, from the criteria of economics, speed and specialization, its meanderings in the Brazilian states under study. With this purpose, information and data will be handled, based on a thorough bibliographical and documentary research on the subject.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Política judiciária nacional de tratamento adequado dos conflitos de interesses: um estudo de caso sobre a mediação e a conciliação no 1º Centro Judiciário de Solução de Conflitos do Fórum Desembargador Sarney Costa
    (Universidade Federal do Maranhão, 2019-07-05) COELHO, Washington Souza; BONATO, Giovanni; BONATO, Giovanni; ZUFELATO, Camilo; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3975939347414439; RAMOS, Newton Pereira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2399244462327090
    This paper analyzes the effects of the Judicial Policy on the Treatment of Conflicts of Interest instituted by Resolution 125/2010, as well as verifying the changes arising from the New Code of Civil Procedure, the Mediation Law and the use of Appropriate Means of Resolution Conflicts after these normative milestones, for this, the application of these means in the Court of Justice of the State of Maranhão is verified, as well as, it performs an analysis of the participation and contribution of the institutional subjects and propellers of the judicial policy within directives integrated for the purpose to analyze whether there has been a reduction in conflicts of interest and how this occurs. Finally, it is carried out by means of the qualitative method of case study, having as object the 1 st. Cejusc of the Judicial Council of Sarney Costa, which integrates the structure of the Judicial Power of Maranhão, where it was sought to analyze the level of user satisfaction, if the means proposed by the CNJ were actually implemented and how the conflict facilitators act.